On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 19:41:14 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 19:12:37 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
defining a new method exho! (derived from echo + mixin...:-)
auto exho(string x)(){
return mixin("writeln("~interp!x~")");}
You can just write:
exho!"The number ${num} doubled is ${num * 2}!"
It requires 'num' to be available to the exho function
definition so will not
work in the general case.
Thats a pity, so shouldn't we than try to find a way to define a
alias like 'shortcut'
for something like
mixin(compiletime_expresion!var)
so we can write just
shortcut!var ?
Or what about defining a new return type for functions allowing
them to return a mixin even if defined in a lib? (Because the
code above is allowed but only working if exho is defined in the
same scope as the var 'num'.)
Regards mt.
