On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 09:40:07 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
I'm sorry, but that's just plain wrong. D does not have ownership pointers because nobody that wants them has stepped up and 1) Done the work of drafting an informal proposal that *actually deals with _all_ of the issues involved*
Wrong. This has been discussed and hashed out to death over and over again. The solutions are on the table.
Walter's position has always been that having more than a single pointer type is a disaster.
That makes further work on it pointless. (Although, arguably, D kinda has several pointer types already).
