On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
Mike, given the general feedback I've received here, I think
the next best take of action is to split the implicit
inheritance proposal into a separate, smaller DIP, and update
DIP 1004 with a second draft.
Thoughts?
To expand on my shorter post above: let's call this review round
officially closed. I'll wait for your updates, then we'll
schedule a second round for the new draft of 1004.
