On Thursday, 11 May 2017 at 11:36:17 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Thursday, 11 May 2017 at 10:51:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 11 May 2017 at 10:49:58 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
We have that syntax already.
I do not understand. Should the syntax I have written already
work as I expect or do you mean my proposal is not possible as
the syntax is ambiguous?
Kind regards
André
I thought it should have worked already.
My apologies the struct literal initialization syntax is
unsupported because of the parser implementation.
I don't know if you would introduce new ambiguities; I suspect
that you wouldn't.
