On Sunday, 14 May 2017 at 13:55:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/14/17 9:24 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
By making body optional and a contextual keyword there should
be no
breaking changes (except for obscure code like `static assert
(!__traits(compiles, { mixin ("int body;"); }))` :D).
It doesn't even need to be optional. It can be required as it
is now (when in/out are specified), just not a keyword. I
believe that this is what is specified in Option 1 of the DIP.
-Steve
Yeah, I'm OK with Option 1. I would just prefer not typing 'body'
when writing functions with contracts.
