On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 00:43:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
What are your thoughts? Has something similar been proposed
before?
It has, and I actually don't hate it, but I also don't think it
is necessary because of the `scope` storage class being one
option and just manually writing out the struct functor being
another viable one. The c++ syntax sugar is nice, but I can
live without it.
It's not just syntax sugar. We don't always need by-reference
captures. And it would be nice to be able to store the delegate
longer than current scope...
