Re: Concept proposal: Safely catching error

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/8/17 11:19 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 14:13:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
void foo(Mutex m, Data d) pure
{
   synchronized(m)
   {
       // ... manipulate d
   } // no guarantee m gets unlocked
}


Isn't synchronized(m) not nothrow?

You're right, it isn't. I actually didn't know that. Also forgot to make 
my function nothrow. Fixed:

void foo(Mutex m, Data d) pure nothrow
{
   try
   {
      synchronized(m)
      {
         // .. manipulate d
      }
   }
   catch(Exception)
   {
   }
}

-Steve