Re: Isn't it about time for D3?

[Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d]

Before even contemplating a big disrupting language split like 
proposed by the OP, wouldn't it first more appropriate to write a 
nice article, DIP, blog, whatever, listing the defects of the 
current language that can not be solved by progressive evolution?
I haven't the impression that the *language* itself suffer from 
so big flaws that it would warrant to fork it in a way that will 
lead to a lot frustration and bewilderment.
D is not perfect, no question, but it is not in a state that 
would jusrify such a harsh approach.