Leandro Lucarella wrote:
There is already goto case; (without specifying the case) for that, at least in the specs :) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#GotoStatement GotoStatement: goto Identifier ; goto default ; goto case ; goto case Expression ; [...] The third form, goto case;, transfers to the next CaseStatement of the innermost enclosing SwitchStatement.
Which is a very in your face explicit fall through. So we understand the advantages of making fall through explicit yet for some reason we need to have a more discreet kind of explicit syntax?
