Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:46 -0700, Travis Boucher wrote: > The future of D to me is very uncertain. I see some very bright > possibilities in the embedded area and the web cluster area (these are > my 2 areas, so I can't speak on the scientific applications). However > the limited targets for the official DMD, and the adoption lag in gdc > (and possibly ldc) are issues that need to be addressed before I can see > the language getting some of the real attention that it deserves.
Agreed, basically you would need to go the gdc/gcc route since e.g. arm/ mips backends on llvm aren't as mature and clearly digitalmars only targets x86.
