On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:33:17PM +0000, Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > Regarding the location of contract checking: Yes, though I agree with > him that a fix for that need not be part of this DIP. If this DIP > cleanly separates contract specification from contract implementation, > we can address it separately. [...]
Not to mention, if we restrict the scope of this DIP to just syntax improvement, it stands a better chance of being accepted by Walter & Andrei. Stuffing too many things into it stands the risk of having the whole thing rejected because of just one or two items that they deem undesirable. T -- Trying to define yourself is like trying to bite your own teeth. -- Alan Watts
