On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:15:38PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > You can always still do in and out block syntax. Or is this DIP > proposing to do away with that? I didn't see any mention of > deprecating current syntax. > > I view this improvement like short lambda syntax. When your lambda is > one expression, so much easier and convenient to use the => form. But > you can always reach for the multi-statement form if needed. [...]
Yes, this is also my understanding: the current syntax will be retained (hence, no breakage of current code), but a new syntax better suited for short contracts will be introduced. I think this is the right way to go. T -- It won't be covered in the book. The source code has to be useful for something, after all. -- Larry Wall
