On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:39:25 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Please, please, please, just do the same as clang.
I don't think clang has this feature, so doing the same as clang would be a regression. We're in uncharted waters!
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:46:33 -0700
On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 at 19:39:25 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Please, please, please, just do the same as clang.
I don't think clang has this feature, so doing the same as clang would be a regression. We're in uncharted waters!