On Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 18:03:39 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
I often do code like "x < array.length" where x needs to be a long to be able to handle negative values.I want my code to compile without warning, and therefore I'm against requiring "x < array.length.to!long()" to remove that warning.
`x < array.length` and `x < array.length.to!long` have different results when x is negative. That's why a warning/error is in order.
