On 11/20/2009 07:51 PM, Chad J wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3536
So Walter, with this you can keep your beloved fall-through.
Now can the rest of us be spared the nasty fall-through bugs, please
please please??
Also, about assert(0)... I'd be happy to change what I did if Walter and
associates feel that adding assert(0) to the list is worth its minor
complications.
(Sorry I don't have a patch for properties, but that one's harder.)
- Chad
<patch critic>
switch(i){
case 1: //this should not yield an error. change it.
case 2:
blah;
break;
}
switch(i){
case 1:
{
break;
} //this should not yield an error. change it.
}
switch(i){
default:
blah; //this should yield an error. change it.
case 0:
case0onlyblah;
}
</patch critic>
