Am Thu, 06 Jul 2017 01:31:44 +0000 schrieb Moritz Maxeiner <[email protected]>:
> But to be clear (and the title and description of any DIP > addressing this should reflect this): > These are not checked exceptions, because checked exceptions > would require bar to declare its exception set manually. Yep, absolutely clear. Just like "auto a = 1" does not declare a variable as we all know declarations start with a type. Instead of defining checked exceptions how it bests fits all your posts in this thread, why not say "Checked exceptions as implemented in Java were a good idea, had they allowed the compiler to infer them where possible." Of course we can still call those inferred checked exceptions something else. ;o) -- Marco
