On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 06:51:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-07-11 03:31, Cym13 wrote:
Is not getting rid of the macro an option? By that I mean
translating the code inside the macro (which can admitedly be
hard because it doesn't have to be semanticaly correct code
due to concatenations but most macros aren't so evil) and add
a pass of cpp to the build.
Not sure I fully understand. Could you give a concrete example?
BTW, it might not be possible if the macros are part of the API
and we want to keep the D API as close as possible to the C API.
And in my experience any non-trivial C API requires the
pre-processor.
Atila
