On 18.07.2017 20:46, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 15:26:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 18.07.2017 14:19, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
D has a C-inspired first-order type system, so it is not necessarily
crucial to have it in D. (The reason I got involved in this thread is
that it was proposed to add Bottom as a type that is not really a
type; 'void' is annoying enough as the 'null' of types. We don't
really need another one of those.)
[...]
What about void?
You can't have a value of type void, but it is not empty either.
For example, this means that the following transformation is not always
valid:
return foo();
<->
auto x = foo();
return x;
