On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 19:19:47 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 18:55:08 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
I really like how the syntax turned out. My only remaining
peeve is the `ContractParameters` nomenclature in the grammar
section, because it implies that asserts are contracts.
Maybe I should have stuck with AssertParameters. That can
easily be fixed.
I know this is being pedantic to an annoying degree (sorry), but
that would just invert the implication's direction, i.e. "it
implies that contracts are asserts". The only way I can think of
right now to get rid of the implication would be to choose a name
that is agnostic to either of them.
