Re: Should masked exceptions be an error?

[Denis Koroskin]

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:31:27 +0300, Nick Sabalausky <a...@a.a> wrote:

"Lars T. Kyllingstad" <pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet> wrote in message
news:heg9jk$7f...@digitalmars.com...

I think the spec should state as a general rule that unreachable code is
an error.

Disagree very much with this. I don't want to have to carefully comment out

temporarily-dead code when I'm inserting debugging breaks and returns.
That'd be a real PITA.

More or less I agree. That's what -w option is for.