Re: static array with inferred size

[Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:58:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 21.09.2017 12:33, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 18:41:51 UTC, Timon Gehr 
wrote:
Can that be done without breakages? -- Andrei

No.

Are thinking about

     typeof([1,2])

changing from

     int[]

to
     int[2]

?

Yes, and everything that entails, for example:

auto x = [1,2];
x ~= 3; // goes from ok to `error: cannot append int to int[2]`.

Ok, breaks code, but I like it. Much better than the current 
behaviour.