I suggest we continue where I made a more extensive reply to you.
Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors?
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Thu, 05 Oct 2017 02:56:00 -0700
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Petar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? nkm1 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? nkm1 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? nkm1 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Dukc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
