On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:09:58PM +0000, Ali via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:27:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:14:51PM +0000, Rion via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > > https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-review-of-D-programming-language > > > > > > It seems that D still has the GC being mentioned up to today. > > > > > > Maybe its better to move the standard library slower to a non gc > > > version in the future... > > > > Why is GC a problem? > > > > > > T > > The reputation is D's GC is slow, and Manual Memory Management is fast
The first point is valid (when are we going to get a better GC? :-/), but the second is questionable. But there's not much you can say to GC-phobic C/C++ aficiandos to convince them otherwise. (I used to be one of them.) T -- Today's society is one of specialization: as you grow, you learn more and more about less and less. Eventually, you know everything about nothing.
