On Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 02:10:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Except... then you can't use generic code with UFCS.
For example, arrays couldn't be ranges, because you can't just
do arr.front, you'd have to do arr.\front.
-Steve
Mmm... it sounds complex ;-)
to make it worse, I can apparently call func() with the
parenthesis:
obj.func;
now, is func an attribute of obj?
is it a method of obj?
is it a free function?
these syntactic abstractions are leaky...we need to encapsulate
intent too ;-)
