On 10/31/17 9:49 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:24:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/28/17 12:59 PM, LunaticWare wrote:
Event if there is no default constructor on struct we can still make
one that work as well as if it were implemented, here is my example n__n
------
You won't ever get the same support for this as C++. D is very clear
that a struct must be constructable from its init value, and be valid.
For instance:
auto p = new Player[1];
assert(p[0].name == "Baz");
I think we can allow CTFE-able default construction.
Isn't that what we already have?
-Steve
