On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 19:22:25 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 16:21:30 UTC, Eljay wrote:
On Monday, 28 March 2011 at 18:59:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/27/2011 10:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I'll be _very_ excited to have both the destructor issues
and the const issues
sorted out. They are some of the more annoying quality of
implementation
issues at the moment.
Yes, I agree those are the top priority at the moment, now
that we have the 64 bit compiler online and the worst of the
optlink issues resolved.
NECRO ALERT...
But I just saw that
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1003.md was
addressed with https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6855 .
I, for one, will miss 'body' the keyword. Now I'll have to
update all my toy code.
(Just kidding, I don't mind updating my toy code. At least it
isn't a codebase the size of Photoshop!)
Don't worry, you've got a few years yet. Currently `body`is not
even deprecated; it's become a conditional keyword, or you can
use `do` in its place.
It may be deprecated, but someone completely removed it from the
documentation on contracts. That could cause some confusion for
people using older versions of the compiler.
https://dlang.org/spec/contracts.html
