On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 13:47:19 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.11.2017 05:55, codephantom wrote:
No, the question should be, what can the compiler prove to be
true/false, correct/incorrect about your code, and what effort
have you made in your code to assist the compiler to make that
determination.
If you've made no effort to provide the compiler with the
context it needs to make a useful determination, then don't
complain when the compiler gets it wrong. That is my first
point.
My second point, is that it is already possible to provide
such context to the compiler, without having to make reference
types non nullable, and therefore having to introduce a new
nullable reference type.
...
It's really not.
Your arguments need a little more work.
