On Sunday, 26 November 2017 at 04:01:31 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 05:53:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
A better GC is a great direction. Generational one is not
feasible unless we disallow quite a few of our features.
What about @safe?
If all of the code is 100% @safe (not system and not trusted) you
have a different language where write barriers would be cheaper
to implement.
Sadly you can’t “skip” write barriers in your @system code
because it may run as part of larger @safe. Which is where they
are the most costly.
