Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:13:23 +0100, Pelle Månsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Walter Bright
void opDispatch(string name, T...)(T values...)
^^^
You didn't use to have to do that with variadic templates. Is that
also a new change in SVN?
I believe it was always like that.
What do you mean? Not the D I played with?
void test1(T...)(T ts) {
writeln(ts); //works as expected
}
void test2(string s, T...)(T ts) {
writeln(s); // requires manual specifying of each type
writeln(ts); // e.g. test2!("foo", int, int)(1,2)
}
void test3(string s, T...)(T ts...) {
writeln(s); // silently dies when called with
writeln(ts); // test3!("foo")(1,2,3,4) in v2.034
}
It would seem Walter is right, but only for opDispatch. This compiles
fine. If you want compile errors, move the ellipsis around:
struct foo {
void opDispatch( string name, T... )( T value... ) {
}
void bar( T... )( T args ) {
}
}
void main( ) {
foo f;
f.bar( 3 );
f.baz( 3.14 );
}
So, why have this special case for opDispatch? Maybe I am missing something.
