A Guy With an Opinion wrote:
Eh...I still don't agree.
anyway, it is something that won't be changed, 'cause there may be code
that rely on current default values.
i'm not really trying to change your mind, i just tried to give a rationale
behind the choice. that's why `char.init` is 255 too, not zero.
still, explicit variable initialization looks better for me. with default
init, it is hard to say if the author just forget to initialize a variable,
and it happens to work, or he knows about the default value and used it.
and the reader don't have to guess what default value is.
