On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 15:45:07 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 14:22:37 UTC, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
And to add more, CommonMark on the other hand has a full spec
written and several test that covers the difficult to get
right parts of Markdown/CommonMark. I'm sure I don't need to
tell you the virtues of a good test suit.
The CommonMark approach is to just take the union of all
possible features and call it a day.
Standards without opinions don't deserve to be implemented by
anyone.
To me, it sounds more to that
https://xkcd.com/927/
