On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 at 23:25:19 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
Have you noticed performance problems or implementation side irregularities?

Well, I was referring to things like in front() having to use code such as `if(!inited) ...; return value`, which was discussed here in the forum in the past.

The performance side hasn't been too bad for me personally (so far...), but I started this thread exactly because I wanted to know if I could move some code to the empty() method of the range, as that would be more convenient and performant. So you could say I mostly noticed the "regularity" part.

Reply via email to