On Sun, 2017-12-24 at 13:27 +0000, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > I like SCons. Do any of the others have advantages over SCons?
That is a moot point. For me SCons is the tool of choice when I am not using Meson. > The Python dependency IME does complicate things because it's not > trivial to get it working on Windows. It's been too long to > remember specifics, but it was an adventure, and if I've got a > working D installation, why am I messing around with Python? Python being hard to install on Windows has been over since Python 3.4. A lot of effort went into making Python installation really easy. Python 3.6 should provide no problems. I am not sure Chocolately does as good a job is using the official installer. But as a Linux user I have no personal evidence. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
