On 27.12.2017 16:37, rjframe wrote:
If the programmer opts-in to those checks... it's a +1 for pragmatism but does make marketing the language a bit weird -- one-liners spawn objections to the integrity of the claim (such as a portion of this thread; if there are objections within the community, how much more will we find objections outside it!).
Frankly, I can see no need to appeal to people who think that having a culture where people feel free to question claims they consider dubious somehow reflects badly on the community or the language (hint: it's the opposite).
