On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 04:49:04 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/27/2017 8:29 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
This does not support the original claim that the design of D
by you is
based on psychology. It may be based on your perception of
other
programmers needs, which is fine per se, but that is not
psychology-
based design.
All programming language design is based on human factors, i.e.
psychology. If it was purely computer science based, it would
be in binary.
01100010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100011
01100001 01101110 00100000 01110011 01110000 01100101 01100001
01101011 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010
01111001 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000
01100110 01101001 01101110 01100101 00100001
