On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 00:26:04 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 08:53:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:[...]I disagree. [...]
syntax is not weird at all. it is ML-ish.
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Dan partelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Dan Partelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Dan Partelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Mengu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Joakim via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Dan Partelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after... Dan Partelly via Digitalmars-d
