On Saturday, 13 January 2018 at 02:15:37 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 13 January 2018 at 02:08:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
Also, Proposal 1 starts with this example
auto (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
(int a, string b) = tuple(1, "2");
but it also looks natural to be able to write
(int, string) (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
Really ?
After the type should be the declarator. In this example
there's no declarator but if you add it then it becomes very
strange:
(int, string) ab (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
I left out a word there...I had meant that it would be natural to
replace the auto version with that version. I would think it
would work in combination with Proposal 3.
If
auto (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
works, then surely
__Tuple!(int, string) (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
should work, which is equivalent to
(int, string) (a, b) = tuple(1, "2");
