On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 at 21:21:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
My thoughts were: http://forum.dlang.org/post/p3e4al$1jfc$1...@digitalmars.com
A starting point could be an unnamed tuple built-in tuple type, but also not yet deprecating the built-in named tuple type in std.typecons.
But as it has been requested more than once and it is a feature of existing Phobos tuples, I can add a proposal to the DIP that can be accepted/rejected independently, and add a few words to the "limitations" section.
Sometimes when you give someone the option to agree or disagree to a bunch of different choices it's harder to come to agreement than if you keep things simple.
