On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 04:37:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 February 2018 at 20:15:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is the kind of thing you should be promoting to Andrei to
convince him that dpldocs is better. ;-)
I'm updating my fork now and check out this merge conflict:
<<<<<<< HEAD
* source = The [isInputRange|input range] to encode.
=======
* source = The $(REF_ALTTEXT input range, isInputRange,
std,range,primitives)
* to _encode.
b905180b1fffa78f922677ee90ed8ae9b803fc4f
My syntax is so much prettier. (note that the stupid leading _
is something I strip out too. Ddoc's most moronic "feature".
Can we PLEASE kill that?!?!?!!)
Have you thought of simply postprocessing REF_ALTTEXT for your
documentation engine for now?
That won't lead to merge conflicts ;-)
e.g.
sed -i "s/[$](REF_ALTTEXT \([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),[^)]*)/[\2|\1]"
**/*.d
