Re: Annoyance with new integer promotion deprecations
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:25:36 -0800
Ouch. I guess "the real WTF" is that 2's complement leads to
supporting one value that cannot be negated. But still, I thought
we had value range propagation rules to avoid this sort of
nonsense when possible (such as the example above)?
- Annoyance with new integer pr... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance with new i... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance with new i... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance with n... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance with n... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance wi... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyanc... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance wi... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance wi... Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyanc... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- OT: int.min Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyance wi... Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Annoyanc... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Ann... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Ann... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
