On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 14:56:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
ooh better last sentence
D's GC implementation follows in the footsteps of industry
giants without compromising experts' ability to realize maximum
potential from the machine.
That's been said over and over and the message has not gotten
through. With a pay for what you use approach the GC is just as
available as it is now, and yes, I completely agree it's very
useful and that the reaction to it is ludicrous. This is an
illogical argument that we've lost so needs a new approach.