On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 12:49:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/16/2018 10:10 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
Could use the name for the field as well. At the minimum useful for debugging purposes.

That would be tricky because fields are decomposed down to primitive types. -- Andrei

That's unfortunate. Not being able to get the names and types together is my main dissatisfaction with the current interface.

Reply via email to