Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Brad Roberts wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
An exception (not an Error) is an expected and documented outcome of a
function. After having listened to those endless Boeing stories,
please listen to this one :o). Contract Programming covers the
correctness of a program, and exceptions are correct behavior. By your
very Boeing stories that I stoically endured, it seems like the
logical conclusion is that postconditions must be evaluated upon
exceptional return.
Consider a constructor. It's postcondition is the class invariant is
satisfied. If it throws, the object is not successfully constructed and
the invariant does not hold.
If the constructor fails, the object never existed. Nothing to
validate is valid.
Right. And I can't see how you can validate the output of a function
that failed. Let's say your function sorts an array, and the post
condition is the array is sorted. So, what would the postcondition be
if it failed?
out (result)
{
assert(failed || isSorted(result));
}
? What's the point?
Very, very interesting example that actually makes my point very nicely.
If the function doesn't throw, the postcondition is that the array is
sorted.
If the function does throw, the postcondition is that the array has not
lost any element. So at least you know that information wasn't lost.
I can't believe this is working so well in my argument :o).
I don't understand why you think that. I can't believe it adds any value
whatsoever.
It's just like checked exceptions, but with a much, much higher burden.
