On 13.03.2018 18:43, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:32:55PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
An unrolled foreach on a tuple has a notion that the flow control
jumps out of the loop, and it's OK to skip further loops (even though
they are technically unrolled).
[...]
This is not true. Foreach on a tuple does *not* skip expanding all
iterations of the loop regardless of any `break`s or `continue`s. It's
the codegen that eliminates the resulting dead code. See:
https://wiki.dlang.org/User:Quickfur/Compile-time_vs._compile-time#Case_Study:_foreach_over_a_type_list
T
I think that's what he was saying. :)
