On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 18:22:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 23 March 2018 at 03:16, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d

(BTW, there's a way to do it without the CTFE fix. One can use the approach I've always used in the past for C, which is write a separate program to generate the tables. This was used in the DMD build, and was gradually replaced with CTFE. It still exists in the backend, which is still in C++.)

Right, but then there's no reason to use D.

Of course there is. It's called "all the other million things D does better than C++ besides CTFE pow".

When D undermine's its own proposed usefulness, it loses against C++ every time, no competition.

Not when it's isolated examples instead of the language as a whole. It's not D's fault programmers are terrible at basic cost/benefit analysis.

Reply via email to