On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 23:58:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2018 23:35:29 MattCoder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Well, to be honest I still can't understand why would you want
to pass a RValue as reference.
Well, it's frequently the case that you don't want to copy an
object if you don't have to...
- Jonathan M Davis
Well the concept it's OK. (Differences between passing by value
vs reference, copy etc.). Except for the const thing in C++,
because I don't know this language, and by the way thanks for
explaining that.
Question:
In C++ the signature of the function which will receive the
references like in this case, need to be "const ref" parameters,
right? - If yes, then since it's const ref parameter, will not
change the value passed, even if it's lvalue, right?
Matt.
