On 3/26/2018 9:26 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 16:37:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a *great
thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising brochure) does
away with these requirements.
Manu is not the only one who has to write such programs because of ^^ (log, exp,
cosh, sinh, tanh... need pow to be CTFE to be CTFE themselves).
It's a lot more unconvenient, and plain different semantics (can't parameterize
the table based on a compile-time value) when compared to having working CTFE.
It is a great idea, and some ought to pull it:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8071
