On 3/31/18 5:37 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And every time you used another library, you'd have the same problem and have to add -unittest=- whatever for each and every one of them, or you would have to use -unittest= with everything from your application or library rather than using -unittest. I really don't see how that scales well, and it's way too manual and too easy to screw up. It might be a decent idea for a workaround, but it's not a great solution.
Nod. We really need to get to the point where the application of unittest is modular.
