== Quote from bearophile ([email protected])'s article > Andrei Alexandrescu: > > Should we yank operator>>>? > We can change it purpose and add the other one: > <<< rotate left > >>> rotate right > Bye, > bearophile
This is a good idea, although rotate may be seldom enough used not to warrant its own (possibly overloadable) operator. std.intrinsic might be a better place for rotate. On the other hand, rotate is a single ASM instruction, at least on x86. In a close to the metal language, there needs to be a straightforward, efficient way to access it.
