On Monday, 30 April 2018 at 02:43:44 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
If the data involved classes then the answer is no, as there is a bug regarding destroy as it involved external finalized c function. I'm writing a DIP draft that address this.
I think I can get around that by storing the data in dynamic arrays for the while I need them, then use the tree for quicker random access.
